logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopolistic Competition

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


Adobe Faces Antitrust Monopoly Class Action

Adobe Systems bought Macromedia to remove its competitor FreeHand from the professional graphic illustration market, and to force users to switch to Adobe's more expensive, and inferior, Illustrator software, graphic designers say in a federal antitrust class action.

More details via CourthouseNews.com here:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/05/36356.htm

With enough government help, I' m really good at this game

Google vs Apple; Is there room for both?

James Kwack writes about the face-off between Google and Apple for control of personal computing, in what at first sight is not germane to the usual subject matter of this blog, but bear with me--in the end, it is about competing monopolies based on different technologies and patents and copyrights link here. In the first of a two part blog series, he describes the evolution of the personal computing and in the second he picks up the appearance of cloud computing and its meaning for the competitive battle. The cloud is Google's realm and the personal computer and associated gadgets like the iPod, iPad, etc. are Apple's. Microsoft is the also-ran in this competition since it seems likely to become increasingly irrelevant to the long-run result.

The key to the Apple strategy is to make the Mac and its spun off gadgets as proprietary as possible, so that owners of the cool gadgets must buy the software which however cannot be used on other makers' hardware, producing a lock-in. Google on the other hand has made the operating system increasingly irrelevant on the PC since it has Windows substitutes in Android and Chrome. While its operating systems are open, its monopoly power derives from its dominance over advertising on the web which it can retain as long as it retains its premier standing in Search software.

On the basis of cost to consumers, it would seem preferable for Google to win this test, but not completely, with the Macs retaining some part of the market based on coolness but at higher prices. In the end, it does not seem quickly apparent that government intervention will provide any consumer benefit, since this industry has fundamental aspects of a natural monopoly, giving the two protagonists a hefty advantage over potential competitors. But each must retain its lead by continuing to innovate.


   
Find online and local Economics Lessons
Economics Lessons | Add your site

Most Recent Comments

Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the

From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think

The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of

Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even

The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith: Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents,

The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated

Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer: "The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication,

Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books. On-line

Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book: It seems to me that behavioral economists

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section. How can I contact you? I have

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents,"

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our

Would books be published without copyright? Gael: I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any

Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright

Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business

Open Book Publisher Thanks for the great book, and for making it free culture. It's worth mentioning that they don't

What the New York Times Should Have Asked What is the patent number for the