defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
The BBC reports about a drug that was available cheaply, got tweaked in a minor way and now available only in a much more expensive format. While the story is not about patenting, it is very similar to it as it is about licensing a drug, in this case for use in the UK, and excluding the old, yet still perfectly effective, drug from use. This is exactly what a patent does, and there are countless examples of pharmaceutical companies doing exactly these very marginal improvements to extract major rents from sick people.
Forbes Article: Going Toe To Toe With Medical Device Giants. Very good article on the economic cost of defending yourself against a patent infringement lawsuit.
Forbes Table Below $10 million Cost to defend a high-stakes patent suit
$10 million Cost to defend a high-stakes patent suit
[Comment at 11/22/2010 07:19 PM by Steve R.]
Have you closed the security breach yet? There were a lot of those inane comments posted overnight.
And why does the post above this one lack a comment submission form? It just says "Submit Comment" and then nothing. I thought maybe the page was cut off when I loaded it but I reloaded it several times and the rest of the page below the words "Submit Comment" was missing every single time.
[Comment at 11/24/2010 12:13 PM by Wrenwrangler]
The post about the drug does not accurately reflect the original article. The original article says that the unlicensed drug is still available, but the UK medical system requires using a licensed drug when it is available. So, the article is very little to do with patents and very much to do with an inflexible public health care system.
[Comment at 11/24/2010 03:00 PM by Anonymous]
I must ask that people, collectively, not post more than a maximum of 9 comments to this site, total, between successive visits by me (generally several a day during the daylight hours on the west coast of North America; so a maximum of 9 during the west coast night and a maximum of 9 every four hours or so the rest of the time). (I post this now because I see someone has just made at least ten new comments in the course of a single hour.)
Otherwise it is impossible for me to use the Most Recent Comments sidebar to catch up on new comments since my previous visit and I am forced to page back through the last several days' worth of posts clicking every one that shows a non-zero number of comments and checking the date on the bottommost comment on each such post, which takes many minutes.
Although with the generally poor comment quality and low activity at this blog lately I'm becoming sorely tempted to simply delete my bookmark for this site instead.
[Comment at 11/26/2010 12:47 AM by Zachary Frederickson]
I feel like I'm often looking for interesting things to read about a variety of subjects, but I manage to include your blog among my reads every day because you have interesting entries that I look forward to. Here's hoping there's a lot more great material coming! Windows 7 Sale
[Comment at 12/07/2010 01:07 AM by Windows 7 Sale]
In general, the main results from this theory compare price-fixing methods across market structures, analyse the impact of a certain structure on welfare, and play with different variations of technological/demand assumptions in order to assess its consequences on the abstract model of society. Most economic textbooks follow the practice of carefully explaining the perfect competition model, only because of its usefulness to understand "departures" from it (the so called imperfect competition models). Mark Taylor,1z1-549 certified
[Comment at 12/08/2010 02:46 AM by mrktlr]
Most Recent Comments
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rerwerwerwer
at 07/08/2019 11:35 PM by WolfLarsen Larsen
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Thank you for this great
at 06/21/2019 02:13 PM by spam name
Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime Eu acho que os direitos autorais da invenção ou projeto devem ser
at 05/11/2019 09:15 PM by Marcelo
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy https://essaywritingsolutions.co.uk/
at 04/07/2019 11:22 PM by WolfLarsen
at 04/07/2019 11:21 PM by WolfLarsen
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rwerwewre
at 04/07/2019 11:20 PM by WolfLarsen
at 02/05/2019 07:44 AM by Anonymous
Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good
at 06/19/2018 10:36 PM by Michael Jones
Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback
at 01/09/2018 03:46 AM by Anonymous
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry
at 05/08/2015 08:35 AM by Dan Dobkin
Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace
at 04/10/2015 10:44 AM by Stephan Kinsella
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default
at 04/10/2015 10:34 AM by Stephan Kinsella
Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without
at 01/08/2015 08:58 PM by Sheogorath
Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do
at 11/17/2014 04:48 AM by David K. Levine
Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous
at 10/29/2014 10:49 AM by Alexander Baker
Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.
at 09/20/2014 03:19 PM by Alexander Baker
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:
at 06/28/2014 10:03 AM by Doris
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,
at 06/28/2014 10:00 AM by Doris
What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic
at 05/05/2014 01:03 PM by Sheogorath
Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the
at 04/07/2014 04:47 AM by Dan McCracken