Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.

Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


A Small (And Tentative) Victory Against Patent Overreach In Stem Cell Research

A group of Wisconsin researchers have tried to claim that they own broad patents relating to embryonic stem cell research. To grant a monopoly in that key area of research would be catastrophic for scientific and health related advancements. Fortunately, the Patent office has rejected the claim. However, don't give the Patent office too much credit here. This was only done after some public interest groups took the trouble to jump through the bureaucratic hoops and raise a stink about it. (Kudos to the Public Patent Foundation!)

The issue can still be appealed by the Wisconsin group, so be sure to follow this important case closely. The question remains if it will have broader ramifications over the stem cell patent cottage industry.

I seem to recall certain celebrities speaking out against politicians with a restrictive stance on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research (Michael J. Fox, the late Christopher Reeve, etc.). This site is not the proper forum for that particular underlying debate. However, it is notable that like-minded celebrities have never spoken out publicly against overly broad patent restrictions - even though that issue will likely impede progress in scientific medical research more than the position of any politician with regards to the federal funding issue. If these people are truly interested in medical progress (and I presume that they are), they might want to consider speaking up on the issue of patent reform.

Some cynics have accused Fox, Reeve and others of using the stem cell issue as merely a way to score cheap partisan points against Republicans. I never doubted their sincerity on the stem cell issue, but here is a perfect opportunity to prove the cynics wrong. I would respectfully suggest that they start by targeting the current Governor of Wisconsin.

[Michael Perelman previously wrote about another group involved in the Wisconsin patent challenge when it was first filed. Be sure to check it out.]

[Here's an idea for you sci-fi writers out there to explore: What if our current patent system had been in place during the discovery of fire? It would be interesting to try and project the ramifications for today's world.]


Submit Comment

Blog Post


Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code



Most Recent Comments

Some history

Killing people with patents SYSSY

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rerwerwerwer

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Thank you for this great

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime Eu acho que os direitos autorais da invenção ou projeto devem ser

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy https://essaywritingsolutions.co.uk/

Your Compulsory Assignment for Tonight rerrerrr

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rwerwewre

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good

Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,