logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Is IP Property

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

IP Trends

From 2005:

IP Trends

Posted by Stephan Kinsella on April 5, 2005 03:37 PM

A Swedish libertarian buddy, Johan Ridenfeldt, pointed me to this article (in Swedish), which describes libertarian (liberal) arguments against intellectual property, and also includes a review of the debate in Nyliberalen (The Neoliberal). He wrote, "I find this very positive. I'm involved (somewhat) in politics, and I have noticed that most of the libertarian young ones agree with us on IP [i.e., that it is problematic and unlibertarian]. This was not the case when I first started quoting you back when your Against IP article was in draft [in 2000 or so]. I used to post and recommend your working paper draft, and back then I was pretty alone in my views."

I have noticed a similar trend. The younger, Internet generation seems to be much more receptive to the notion that there are no property rights in information and ideas. Whether this is because they are more open minded, more libertarian, or anti-big-business, I am not sure. I have noticed that most of the older types are much more resistant to challenges to IP.Coda: Jim Newland writes:

Sheesh, Stephan. I'm an old fogey and even I know the answer to this one. It's because they've grown up in the digital era, with its easily traded and downloaded electronic files. The impossibility of actually owning an idea or anything else nonmaterial is brought into sharp focus with the ubiquity of the internet. For instance, in the case of videogame pirates, they ask how they can be accused of stealing something when the original product remains with its original owner. This starts them thinking about the whole idea of intellectual property and the notion that one can somehow own something as ephemeral as a thought.
And a college student writes,
The reason is actually pretty simple. The RIAA just sued my roommate and about 10 other kids here at [my college]. The younger generation is anti-IP because we love free file sharing and hate getting sued.

Comments

There is a social evolutionary trend that is be being overlooked. Basically, the younger you are (either as a person or as a business) the more liberal you are. As one ages, people and businesses tend to become more conservative, even to the extent of being repressive in certain instances.

A more meaningfully analysis of IP trends would revolve around the younger generation maintaining there liberal bias over time and/or the older generation developing a liberal bias. I assume that we don't want to wait 20-30 years to see whether the younger generation maintains its liberal bias, but we can see now what the older generation is expressing. More examples in the form of your post "An Objectivist Recants on IP" would better disclose whether the concept of IP is on its hopeful road to oblivion.

"As one ages, people and businesses tend to become more conservative, even to the extent of being repressive in certain instances."

For a simple reason: one establishes a place in the scheme of things, and then favors the status quo. One who has not yet established a place (young person, startup company) has little to lose by shaking things up, and may have a great deal to gain, by tilting the entire playing field to their advantage.

So, both are behaving quite logically.

@ Nobody

Quite true, but the question is one of trend. If you can convince an old conservative person to change their viewpoint or a young liberal person to maintain their liberal viewpoint, then I think you can document that change in the IP landscape is indeed occurring. I hope that change is occurring.

just want to ask, why are you really against monopoly? :) hutch for desk
I think that it is good professional resume.
Make sure that you consider the learning needs of your audience and the reasons why you're writing your articles. As much as possible, go with topics that are relatively new. Talking about the same old topics over and over again will not help you get your articles noticed by online users.Article marketing is the process of submitting articles to article directories for website owners to use as content on their sites for free. In exchange for providing this content you can place a resource or 'bio box' at the end of your article which you can use to gain traffic to your site. academic writing AND Buy Dissertation AND Buy Essay
I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it, I have you bookmarked to check out all the new stuff you post.... Buy Research Paper AND Buy Term Paper AND Buy Thesis


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoSixEightTwo:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the

Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples

Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you

Bonfire of the Missalettes!

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? I wondered about TFP, because I had heard that TFP was increasing. Apparently, it depends on who

Music without copyright I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They are very convincing and will