defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
My view of Apple-Samsung summarized pretty well in the Financial Times. Just bear in mind that companies that build great products generally find that more profitable to compete in the market rather than in court.
What is even more interesting is that the jurors had pretty well decided the case the second day, when internal Samsung e-mails indicated that Samsung had COPIED (that's correct, the copying that NEVER happens) Apple's technology. I guess those who can, innovate. Those who can't, copy someone else's technology.
[Comment at 09/05/2012 11:32 AM by Anonymous]
Just what makes you think that Apple is headed to the scrap heap of history?
[Comment at 09/05/2012 11:34 AM by Anonymous]
Samsung is one of the top two or three patenting companies in the United States. They have sued multiple companies for patent infringement. I am not sure of their win/loss ratio, but they are unafraid of suing others for infringement. Of course, this time they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar, willfully infringing Apple's patents. Naughty, naughty.
[Comment at 09/08/2012 07:56 PM by Anonymous]
I see Apple's path to the "scrapheap of history" is going the long route. Apple's share price hit a record high today and orders for the iPhone 5 have established a couple of records. The government estimates that that the iPhone 5 will have a measurable effect on GDP. Not too bad for a company that is heading for the "scrapheap of history."
I seem to recall that the poster predicted that Italy's pharmaceutical industry was going to collapse after the introduction of patents in 1978. I seem to recall that when patents were introduced, Italy ranked 5th in world production of pharmaceuticals and 7th in terms of pharmaceutical exports. Well, it has been 34 years since the introduction of patents in Italy. Surely there are indications of the collapse of the Italian pharmaceutical industry by now.
The most recent figures indicate that Italy now ranks 7th in world production of pharmaceuticals and 9th in terms of exports. The Italian pharmaceutical industry has been growing at healthy rate over the last several years, and the Italian pharmaceutical industry has been taking market share from the top five producers.
I guess predictions with respect to intellectual property are tough to make.
[Comment at 09/17/2012 06:42 PM by Anonymous]
Most Recent Comments
Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback
at 01/09/2018 03:46 AM by Anonymous
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry
at 05/08/2015 08:35 AM by Dan Dobkin
Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace
at 04/10/2015 10:44 AM by Stephan Kinsella
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default
at 04/10/2015 10:34 AM by Stephan Kinsella
Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without
at 01/08/2015 08:58 PM by Sheogorath
Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do
at 11/17/2014 04:48 AM by David K. Levine
Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous
at 10/29/2014 10:49 AM by Alexander Baker
Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.
at 09/20/2014 03:19 PM by Alexander Baker
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:
at 06/28/2014 10:03 AM by Doris
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,
at 06/28/2014 10:00 AM by Doris
What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic
at 05/05/2014 01:03 PM by Sheogorath
Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the
at 04/07/2014 04:47 AM by Dan McCracken
Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples
at 01/13/2014 06:13 AM by Anonymous
Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be
at 11/28/2013 05:03 PM by Stephanie Smith
at 11/28/2013 09:23 AM by Anonymous
at 11/28/2013 09:22 AM by Anonymous
Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you
at 11/24/2013 10:48 AM by SpaceCorp Technologies
at 11/20/2013 03:18 PM by Anonymous
Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since
at 11/02/2013 08:09 PM by Anonymous
Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? I wondered about TFP, because I had heard that TFP was increasing. Apparently, it depends on who
at 11/02/2013 08:08 PM by Anonymous