defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Here's an interesting post, which is linked to at the www.divisionoflabour.com blog.
[Comment at 09/30/2008 04:51 AM by Bill Stepp]
I hope you are wrong.
I like the stallion analogy, because it is appropriate. However, as ranchers and cowboys know, you work with the horse and eventually develop a trust and rapport with the horse. Controlling the stallion without the trust and rapport never works. Further, sometimes the stallion will go off in unexpected directions. The appropriate response is to gently reassert your leadership, not beat the horse or put it into a smaller corral.
Unfortunately, it is our government that refuses to learn the new tricks, not the stallion. Regulation can be good and useful, particularly when there are a pattern of abuses, but over-regulation merely makes things more unpredictable and in the current case delays market response to actual economic conditions.
The moral of the story: The current market correction is necessary and healthy, and the government should avoid stepping in unless there is an actual crisis instead of a made-up one.
[Comment at 09/30/2008 05:30 AM by Lonnie E. Holder]
The link provided by Bill to "Scapegoating Markets" is a good article. What troubles me is that if we want a free market to work effectively we need to have responsible self-control.
The article correctly notes that greed has existed forever and analogized it to gravity. The obvious implication, greed is a perpetual force that we have to live with. But there is a difference, an improperly designed airplane will not fly. Greed on the other hand can be designed to be hidden. So our financial system was able to fly (using innovative accounting) for a while, before the house-of-cards was exposed and collapsed.
I doubt any of us want a socialist economy, however it continually astonishes me that most free market advocates (despite the mantra of responsibility) never actually call for self responsibility. The unintended consequence of not acting responsibly when those actions hurt citizens is the imposition of State control on your actions. Much like a parent taking away the keys to the car when a teenager gets too many tickets.
One could also say that the financial institutions, in their unfettered greed, killed the goose laying the golden eggs.
[Comment at 09/30/2008 05:42 AM by Steve R.]
Most Recent Comments
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry
at 05/08/2015 08:35 AM by Dan Dobkin
Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace
at 04/10/2015 10:44 AM by Stephan Kinsella
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default
at 04/10/2015 10:34 AM by Stephan Kinsella
Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without
at 01/08/2015 08:58 PM by Sheogorath
Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do
at 11/17/2014 04:48 AM by David K. Levine
Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous
at 10/29/2014 10:49 AM by Alexander Baker
Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.
at 09/20/2014 03:19 PM by Alexander Baker
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:
at 06/28/2014 10:03 AM by Doris
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,
at 06/28/2014 10:00 AM by Doris
What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic
at 05/05/2014 01:03 PM by Sheogorath
Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the
at 04/07/2014 04:47 AM by Dan McCracken
Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples
at 01/13/2014 06:13 AM by Anonymous
Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be
at 11/28/2013 05:03 PM by Stephanie Smith
at 11/28/2013 09:23 AM by Anonymous
at 11/28/2013 09:22 AM by Anonymous
Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you
at 11/24/2013 10:48 AM by SpaceCorp Technologies
at 11/20/2013 03:18 PM by Anonymous
Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since
at 11/02/2013 08:09 PM by Anonymous
Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? I wondered about TFP, because I had heard that TFP was increasing. Apparently, it depends on who
at 11/02/2013 08:08 PM by Anonymous
Music without copyright I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They are very convincing and will
at 09/23/2013 07:46 AM by audience response software