logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Google Book Contract

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


Update and critique of the proposed GOOGLE settlement

In the spirit of April 1, Miracle Jones at Slashdot writes, "In a move that has shocked the publishing world, Judge Denny Chin has filed a brief saying that he has decided to cut the Google Book Settlement in half, letting Google host the first half of every book the company has scanned, and letting other interested stakeholders fight for the rights to the rest." link here

More compelling is Annalee Newitz' long highly critical discussion of the proposed GBS (Google Book Settlement" entitled 5 Ways The Google Book Settlement Will Change The Future of Reading link here.

The five ways are: 1. It may become harder to get information online about books from writers you love.

2. You will find yourself reading free books online, by authors who have disappeared. And Google will make money when you do.

3. Google will be competing with Apple and Amazon and everybody else to be your favorite online bookseller.

4. Libraries and bookstores will be the same thing.

5. Pulp science fiction will make a comeback in ways you might not expect.

These points don't really do justice to the content of the piece. For those hung up on copyright monopolies, the GBS won't do. For those who want to see all those books that have evaporated into the "Out of Print" ether or are in libraries with the only copy, some settlement like the one proposed makes sense. Still, it might be better if time is allowed to run and wear the two sides down to a compromise.

The Authors Guild

I wonder how many authors selected the Authors Guild to be there representative. Am i part of something like a class action suit where my representatives oppose my own interest.


   

Most Recent Comments

Microsoft gets patent for Windows shutdown "If I understand it right, Microsoft is now the sole owner of the procedure asking whether you

Microsoft patents file rights management CK: Ah, so it is PolicyKit + metadata that they have

Pimps and Ferrets: Copyright and Culture in the United States, 1831-1891 Absolutely fascinating. But what-all does it have to do with Copyright and Culture in the United

Against Intellectual Monopoly against Against Intellectual Property Debt Solutions and Lending's credit debt settlement Florida experts will begin working with you

Pimps and Ferrets: Copyright and Culture in the United States, 1831-1891 Utilize our debt settlement attorneys to negotiate credit card debt relief Florida on your behalf.

The Ethical Case Against Intellectual Property, by David Koepsell Transcription here:

Headline stock news delayed to the benefit of big traders The appeals court essentially stayed a New York federal judge's ruling that Theflyonthewall

NBC--Comcast combo will screw the public Bill Stepp writes: Nobody Nowhere [accusation deleted]. [calls me a liar]. Look in the fucking

NBC--Comcast combo will screw the public Nobody Nowhere referred to Anonymous as "Anonyshit" in an earlier comment. He also lied by saying

NBC--Comcast combo will screw the public Zachary Frederickson writes: [insult deleted] No. None of the nasty things that you have said or