The broader significance is that the big players in the industry can be challenged, as Google has done, but it looks as if that may be the last. The big guys have circled the wagons and will win unless the patent law gets changed. Chances?
![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovateSoftware Patents |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
|
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backWith its patent, Apple can stick it to you with two fingers APPLE has now received a patent for two fingered gestures on a touchscreen according to this link here and to a much more extensive set of claims by another interpretation link here. For the rest of us, it would appear there is loads of prior art that would preclude granting such a patent but the Patent Office seems unable to resist granting them and extending the monopoly farther and farther. But why should two finger gestures get patented while one finger ones don't?
The broader significance is that the big players in the industry can be challenged, as Google has done, but it looks as if that may be the last. The big guys have circled the wagons and will win unless the patent law gets changed. Chances?
[Posted at 07/04/2011 06:05 PM by John Bennett on Software Patents Comments Apple has been patenting their technology hot and heavy since the early 1980's. As I see it, SSDD - same s___, different day. Seems as though someone quoted Steve Jobs erroneous statement that it was supposedly easier in the "early" days, meaning the first year Apple was in business. After that, the patent filings began. [Comment at 07/04/2011 09:44 PM by Ayn Ran Was Right] Submit Comment |
|
Most Recent Comments IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Its not the case that reader must be completely agreed with author's views about article. So this at 04/30/2013 02:15 AM by Powercom ARS
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy My brother and I genuinely enjoyed reading on this site, I was just interested to know if you trade at 04/28/2013 07:43 AM by The Body Project
Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly at 01/31/2013 07:21 AM by Anonymous
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a at 01/02/2013 04:58 AM by Sabrina
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the at 12/28/2012 06:57 AM by Byte
From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think at 12/21/2012 06:18 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of at 12/20/2012 05:46 PM by Anonymous
Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even at 12/19/2012 06:08 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith:
Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents, at 12/19/2012 04:54 PM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated at 12/19/2012 04:04 AM by Adam_Smith
Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer:
"The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication, at 12/05/2012 08:31 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books.
On-line at 12/04/2012 09:59 AM by taxpayer
Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book:
It seems to me that behavioral economists at 11/27/2012 08:38 PM by Aaron Wolf
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section.
How can I contact you?
I have at 11/27/2012 10:17 AM by Thomas Stringer
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused at 11/23/2012 08:31 AM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents," at 11/21/2012 03:16 PM by Beer Innovation
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our at 10/24/2012 08:40 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? Gael:
I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any at 10/19/2012 01:12 PM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright at 10/19/2012 11:46 AM by Gael N.
Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business at 10/13/2012 08:47 AM by Anonymous
|