logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Talk about long term copyright

(from Akin at Irdial...I think I'll just reproduce the email he got...)

Dear Irdial-Discs,

We have removed your document "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" because our text matching system determined that it was very similar to a work that has been marked as copyrighted and not permitted on Scribd.

Like all automated matching systems, our system is not perfect and occasionally makes mistakes. If you believe that your document is not infringing, please contact us at copyright@scribd.com and we will investigate the matter.

As stated in our terms of use, repeated incidents of copyright infringement will result in the deletion of your Scribd.com account and prohibit you from uploading material to Scribd.com in the future. To prevent us from having to take these steps, please delete from scribd.com any material you have uploaded to which you do not own the necessary rights and refrain from uploading any material you are not entitled to upload. For more information about Scribd.com's copyright policy, please read the Terms of Use located at http://www.scribd.com/terms

Jason Bentley

Directory of Community Development

jason@scribd.com

For the record Adam Smith died in 1790 and nothing he wrote is currently under copyright any where in the world.


Comments

No, his agent called from the afterlife, and he's really upset. :-)

Just kidding - we restored that document immediately.

This scenario points to a BIG wrong with this whole process. No due process!!!! Your stuff can removed based on some flimsy accusation. Then if you believe that you are somehow injured; you have to prove, on your own time and at your own expense, how the material is legitimate. This is a threat to our entire legal system. (I hope that those who have their stuff improperly take down would sue the offending web site. Now this also gets into how ELUA are really not valid contracts since they "strip" the consumer of their rights.)

Other problems:

1. Suppose a competitor or someone else files a complaint every time you post your item and the website simply removes it. The website isn't going to do any real due diligence, it would be too expensive and time consuming so they will automatically delete it. And through their ELUA they will assert that it is your problem to get the material restored.

2. Getting through to customer service is sometimes a joke. Will a website really devote any staff and computer resources to listen to someone who claims that their stuff was improperly removed and to then restore content that has been taken down?

3. Will the little guy have the same "rights" as the big guys? I am sure that if the RIAA wants something take down, it will be taken down immediately. What happens if Jane Doe feels that she is infringed? Would the website even pay attention?

To be fair to Scribd, @JasonAtScribd just replied to my tweet about this with this:

@glynmoody @owenblacker That was a technical error was corrected almost immediately.
Worse than no due process. It's robot process.
What's wrong with Smith having a 220-year copyright on his writings? Seems fair to me.

But if he tries to extend it even further, then that would be a problem. I think 220 years is long enough (though Big Pharma would likely take issue with such a "short", 220-year limit).

What's wrong with Smith having a 220-year copyright on his writings? Seems fair to me.

Indeed. If we take that away, then what incentive does he have to rise from the grave and write a sequel?


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoEightEightSix:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the

Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples

Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you

Bonfire of the Missalettes!

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? I wondered about TFP, because I had heard that TFP was increasing. Apparently, it depends on who

Music without copyright I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They are very convincing and will

Music without copyright It's strange, that sometimes the most simple suggestions are often the most useful! I will take the

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art To Loup Vaillant: "So, you think we wouldn't have had those 9 technologies without patents? I can

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art @anonymous: So, you think we wouldn't have had those 9 technologies without patents? I can accept

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art The fact is that in the last 20-25 years the technologies of rapid prototyping (today known as

Public Knowledge announces a Patent Reform Project No patents should be allowed on ANY software. And no patents on Business Methods. If the have to

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art The fact is that in the last 20-25 years the technologies of rapid prototyping (today known as