logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

King Kong

It will probably seem like I am picking on Tim Lee, but I think he is articulate and sensible. I also think that Mike Masnick is articulate and sensible, but then again, he is agreeing with me. Tim argues about my post concerning movie costs
This is a good argument, but I still don't entirely buy it. Certainly, this gives us a reason to think the optimal price for movies in the future will not be $200 million, as better technology allows us to cut the costs of the expensive special effects and film-based recording technologies that contribute to the cost of Hollywood movies. Certainly, that will bring down the cost of blockbuster movies somewhat.

...

I have the impression (please correct me if I'm wrong) that much of the cost is driven by the immense amount of labor required to create a top-quality film. You've got lighting crews, camera crews, makeup crews, set crews, sound crews, post-production crews, and on and on. Another major cost is the environment in which actors act. Either you have to move your cast and crew to a new location, which involves a lot of travel costs, or you have to construct sets, which requires considerable materials and labor for their construction.

Star Wreck had all of this. I think at this point a picture and quote should do the trick. This is the bridge of the starship in Star Wreck

In the earlier post I talked about the render farm because I thought the picture of the kitchen was a pretty low cost example of a render farm. But if you see the movie - you will realize that they have elaborate sets, ranging from the bridge of several starships - much more elaborate and larger than in the Star Trek or Star Wars movies - as for example, the set above - to battles in the snow or inside a nuclear center. How did they do this? The quote is worth repeating
A: What sets? The bridge sets are all virtual. The on-location shoots were made at locations that didn't cost any money (schools, public places etc). The "bluescreen studio" is actually a small piece of blue linoleum in Samuli's living room...
The cost in other words was essentially nothing. See the movie then read how they did it - it changed my mind about the costs of making a movie, I suspect it will change yours. BTW - I don't know what they did for a sound crew, but the sound quality sounds to me to be quite good.

Comments

Look, I don't claim that technology hasn't brought down the cost of producing movies. It obviously has, and will obviously continue to do so. But I think you're over-stating the magnitude of the savings here. This movie team was in a peculiar situation: they had gobs of free labor but very little money. And so they chose production methods that were cheap but labor-intensive. The cost of the bridge set was not "essentially nothing." It was hundreds, if not thousands of hours of extra labor. Read the next two question in the FAQ:
All the people on the bridge are shot separately in front of a bluescreen. This shot comprises seven people shot during the last five years. Camera angles have to be carefully planned in advance to create the illusion that it was all shot at the same time.
Shooting seven separate people and compositing them together is almost certainly far slower for everyone involved--the actors, the camera, lighting, and sound crews, and especially the post-production crew that has to stitch it all together. I'm not in this business, so I don't know how much extra time, but I imagine that this was part of the reason it took them 7 years to make the movie. Moreover, this process has to affect the quality of the acting. It's difficult to emote properly when you're acting against a bluescreen and you have to imagine that your fellow actors have just said their lines, even though they're really down the street getting lunch. In short, the low cost of this movie looks to me to be mostly an anomaly dirven by the devotion of sci-fi fans who made it. They subsidized it with thousands of hours of their time. If you were making a movie that doesn't attract that much passion--say a romantic comedy--you would have to pay warm bodies to do all of those jobs. Once you have to pay your compositors, actors, and camera crews market rates than getting them for free, you might not think those virtual sets are so cheap.
They also said that the reason it took 7 years is because when they started out they had no idea what they were doing and it took years to figure out. We should find out the real answer soon enough: they are making a second movie. We'll see how long it takes and what it costs, or if they can makes movies with very low production cost for real.

Most of the cost of $200 million movies is in the special effects and the star actors/actresses. The special effects we agree are spoken for. If movies bring in less money, the big stars will earn less - sad perhaps for them, but for the rest of us?

thanks for this wonderful article, that helps

whitetail deer hunting | fallow deer hunts

They also said that the reason it took 7 years is because when they started out they had no idea what they were doing and it took years to figure out.

my blogpost

This movie is rather good to see write my essay.
Hey buddy, great morning. Fascinating publish. thesis help You've acquired a brand new fan. Please sustain the great operate and that i look ahead to much more of one's incredible posts essay help
Just what I was looking for and quite thorough as well. Thanks for posting this, I saw a couple other similar posts but yours was the best so far. I hope it stays updated, take care. Ruby @ Cell Phone Tracking
Worth sharing this information. Good Work high school diploma online high school diploma online diploma online high school diploma
Even with the reduced costs of movie product I think it's safe to say the studios will keep jacking up the prices in order to pad their pockets.

-Kson unlock iphone


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoSixNineSix:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rerwerwerwer

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Thank you for this great

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime Eu acho que os direitos autorais da invenção ou projeto devem ser

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy https://essaywritingsolutions.co.uk/

Your Compulsory Assignment for Tonight rerrerrr

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rwerwewre

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good

Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the