Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.

Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


Case of the Rent-Seeking Airline Employees

Just when you thought airline delays and dirty planes couldn't get any worse comes an article in today's Wall Street Journal that gives airline passengers hope: "Case of the Vanishing Airport Lines" .

Alaska Air created a check-in process eliminating lots of airline counters (see the graphic) that reduces waiting time. But sad to say it, they patented this 4-step business process.

Step 1: Bypass ticket counter and go to a self-service kiosk.

Step 2: Check in at the kiosk, get boarding pass printed at kiosk.

Step 3: Leave luggage at bag drop station where bags are tagged.

Step 4: Go to security screening.

What's novel and non-obvious about any of this?

Self-service kiosks? Nope.

Checking in at kiosk, getting a pass? Nada.

Leaving luggage with an attendant, who bags it? Nein.

Going to screening? Non.

Can you say "bogus patent"?

It turns out that the firm took out the patent not to keep competitors at bay, but to reward those employees who worked on this, supposedly.

Supposedly, since Delta Airlines has done something similar in Atlanta, after viewing AA's setup in Anchorage. Will AA sue? If not, what's the point of getting a patent to reward its employees? Where are the rents if other airlines aren't prevented from building similar systems? Are they saying they just want to waste their shareholders' money paying patent lawyers? Or maybe they are reluctant to sue because they think their patent would be challenged, causing further litigation and more hard-earned shareholders' money to wash down the drain. Especially since the legal climate seems to be shifting away from patent holders, at least a little bit.


Your link is incorrect. It leads to a "free preview" rather than to the full text of the WSJ article. Please link to the full text of the WSJ article. Thank you.
If you read the damn article you'd see the link to the full article at the bottom FOR SUBSCRIBERS.

Submit Comment

Blog Post


Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code



Most Recent Comments

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Congratulations! You have just found the best online essay writer service! With our help you will

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy It seems to that I'm a pirate too, I use free markets and free software, I thought - if it is free

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer

Dr. Who?

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Replying to Stephan: As I noted elsewhere, I'm fine with abolishing the system, just don't think

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the

Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples

Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines