logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Google Patents Its Home Page Layout

You can't make this stuff up.

As reported on Patently-O,

Earlier this week, the USPTO issued a design patent to Google that covers the "ornamental design for a graphical user interface [GUI] … as shown and described." Pat. No. D. 599,372. Design patent coverage is essentially defined by the images include in the issued patent. Here, the image looks roughly the same as the company's ubiquitous Google.com homepage. (See image below.)

To be clear, many patent professionals would argue that it is misleading to ever simply call this "a patent." Rather, it is a design patent. Design patents have severely limited scope, only cover ornamental designs rather than technological advances, and are very frequently found invalid when challenged in court. The USPTO has been granting design patent protection for screen shots and icons for many years. However, to my (limited) knowledge, none of those design patents have ever been enforced in court. ...

Dashed or "ghost" lines in the drawing indicate features that are not claimed. Thus, patent would be infringed by someone using an identical layout even if they replaced the "Google" mark with their own mark. You can note at the bottom that the design patent drawing is marked with a circle-c ©. That indicates that Google is also claiming copyright protection for this layout. In addition, in the design patent, Google indicates that it is also claiming trademark protection for portions of the layout and - perhaps - for the layout as a whole.

[SK cross-post]


Comments

The more you complain about stuff like this, the more people support it. I cited Mike Masnick's "Streisand Effect."

I see Alonniemouse has completely misunderstood the Streisand Effect too.

Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
TwoUnoThreeSeven:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

How to extract money for using copyrighted performances The New York Times Magazine followed up on its earlier piece about The Copyright Enforcers with

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost Enabling people to set up contests or awards of prizes is what I hope my Contingency Market can

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost A couple of things can be done to encourage phamaceutical development without creating a monopoly.

Comment Posting Announcement Justin Levine's post has comments disabled again: Paul Allen Files Patent Lawsuits Against The

Germany Not many comments on that article. I presume that means it has a tiny audience. Oh well, I guess

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost To start with, shift the cost burden of later-stage clinical trials to the FDA and

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost If I may ask a very simple question. What would you do to encourage the "invention" of new and

Free textbooks If you are unable to get free textbooks but need cheap college books, I recommend visiting

Comment Posting Announcement Lewis Hyde's Justin Levine has disabled

Music without copyright Thanks for the healthy info. rent