logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Koepsell - Quinn "Debate" on Gene Patents

Who Owns You? Corporations Patenting Your Genes

A debate between IP opponent David Koepsell and patent attorney Gene Quinn about gene patents. As noted in IP Debate? (see also Gene Quinn the Patent Watchdog and Is It So Crazy For A Patent Attorney To Think Patents Harm Innovation?), Quinn previously said he wanted to debate an IP opponent, before transparently banning me from his site after I called his bluff; then David Koepsell offered to debate Quinn--it was supposed to be held yesterday at Cardozo law school, but then Quinn backed out, and finally agreed to the online thing you see above. Good thing for him he was not there face to face to present his embarrassingly weak "arguments."

[SK cross-post]


Comments

Pro IPers all have the same argument... It's a silly, thinly veiled excuse to rationalize their unethical behavior.
In general, I'm not anti-patent at all; but I believe that, at present, gene patenting may present a somewhat different issue. Certainly it is significant that a U.S. Health Department advisory group just issued a report indicating that too much gene patenting and accompanying patent litigation can detrimentally affect genetic research and patients' healthcare options. Square that, however, with another report released this week, showing that university/corporate R&D partnerships have become critical to the economy. There needs to be a thorough balancing of interests in regard to this question; I look forward to reviewing more of the arguments on both sides.
"Square that, however, with another report released this week, showing that university/corporate R&D partnerships have become critical to the economy."

I'm highly skeptical of such reports. Every corporation puts out papers showing how critical they are to the economy. They use such papers to make erroneous claims that bailouts are necessary for the airlines, banks, and GM.

Consumers get to make decisions about what they want through free market transactions, if the goods and services being produced by these companies are truly critical to people, then one would expect their critical nature to be revealed by consumer demand for them. GM wasn't critical, we already have cars made by other manufacturers, and they do a better job at it than GM. Resources are currently being wasted on GM - who make cars that most people don't want - when they would be better spent going to companies that make things people do want. Wealth creation instead of wealth destruction.

The "balance of interests" mentioned by Gena777 presupposes that companies should be able to weigh in on what consumers should be doing with their own money, usually with companies convinced they shouldn't have to please consumers, but just be able to justify themselves to a government official as being important because they happen to pay workers while they lose money. Paying workers to produce things people don't want isn't good for the economy (if it were we could just pay people to dig holes and fill them back in). When bad companies are paying workers to produce goods or services that lose money, they're wasting investment resources that could go to more productive use: actually creating wealth instead of destroying it.

>> showing that university/corporate R&D partnerships have become critical to the economy

I'm sure some in the past have also felt that razing towns had become critical to their economy as well.

A pirate (a real one) largely believes, today, that raiding ships has become critical to his/her economy.

Change the rules that free the participants in the economy from the stifling shackles of these patent monopolies and you will solve the economy's dependency problem.

Quinn backed out, and finally agreed to the online thing you see above. Good thing for him he was not there face to face to present his embarrassingly weak "arguments." motorola z3
I like the way you start and then conclude your thoughts. Thanks for this information. I really appreciate your work, keep it up.
Dave @ quick house sale

Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
SevenSevenTwoThree:


Post



   
Find online and local Economics Lessons
Economics Lessons | Add your site

Most Recent Comments

All Our Innovation Are Belong You

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy The team of http://special-essays.com offers substantial assistance and useful tips from

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the

Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples

Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you

Bonfire of the Missalettes!

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? I wondered about TFP, because I had heard that TFP was increasing. Apparently, it depends on who

Music without copyright I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They are very convincing and will

Music without copyright It's strange, that sometimes the most simple suggestions are often the most useful! I will take the

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art To Loup Vaillant: "So, you think we wouldn't have had those 9 technologies without patents? I can

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art @anonymous: So, you think we wouldn't have had those 9 technologies without patents? I can accept

Patents on 3D Printing Challenged by Prior Art The fact is that in the last 20-25 years the technologies of rapid prototyping (today known as

Public Knowledge announces a Patent Reform Project No patents should be allowed on ANY software. And no patents on Business Methods. If the have to