defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
A better title would have been "Is this the beginning of the end of gene patenting.?" I assume there will be an appeal to the CAFC. If the CAFC rules against the patent holder, then there will likely be a shot with the Supreme Court. Because this issue is fairly high profile I suspect this case might be fast-tracked. The appeal has to come fairly soon, so watch for the announcement.
Even if this is the beginning of the end for gene patents, the methodologies used to find genes will still remain patentable.
[Comment at 03/30/2010 06:09 AM by Anonymous]
In defense of Myriad Genetics, they spent lots of $$ to discover these genes and their use in cancer therapy, so if you are going to have a patent system to reward incurring sunk costs, then you should give them the patents. That being said, if you dont feel that patents are socially desirable then get rid of the entire system, not just parts of it.
[Comment at 03/31/2010 02:16 PM by Paul Grootendorst]
@Paul, so they sunk a lot of money into research, well too bad. We have, at least in theory, a capitalistic system. Risk money and maybe you will be rewarded. People and corporations invest in a lot of things, some make money and some lose money. That's the breaks.
Patents are meant to give a LIMITED monopoly over an invention, not for discovering things. We unfortunately seem to live in a society of ever expansive "rights", patents and copyright being perceived, now, as a right rather than a privilege.
[Comment at 03/31/2010 04:45 PM by Steve R.]
Based on my understanding of the Myriad patent, they did in fact discover the genes. They did not invent them. Understanding that those genes are associated with breast cancer is the equivalent of understanding that viruses cause influenza. Congratulations to Myriad for learning that. But, they do not deserve a patent under the present system.
Steve is not talking about getting rid of parts of the patent system. He is talking about the fact that the present system does not reward "discovery." "Discover" is, by law, excluded from patentability. Thus, calculus, geometry, physics, quantum mechanics, etc., are all non-patentable because they are not inventions, but creations that explain the world around us. They are excluded, by law, from being patentable.
[Comment at 03/31/2010 06:16 PM by Anonymous]
We'll see later, where it will lead us, we can do that with custom term papers help
[Comment at 04/03/2010 08:20 AM by Sandie]
Your comments do not make any sense, Sandie.
[Comment at 04/03/2010 10:12 PM by Nobody Nowhere]
i'm sure that Term Papers can open smth new for Myriad Genetics!
[Comment at 04/08/2010 01:58 AM by blackjack]
i'm sure that Term Papers can open smth new for Myriad Genetics!
[Comment at 04/08/2010 01:59 AM by blackjack]
Most Recent Comments
Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly
at 01/31/2013 07:21 AM by Anonymous
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a
at 01/02/2013 04:58 AM by Sabrina
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the
at 12/28/2012 06:57 AM by Byte
From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think
at 12/21/2012 06:18 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of
at 12/20/2012 05:46 PM by Anonymous
Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even
at 12/19/2012 06:08 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith: Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents,
at 12/19/2012 04:54 PM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated
at 12/19/2012 04:04 AM by Adam_Smith
Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer: "The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication,
at 12/05/2012 08:31 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books. On-line
at 12/04/2012 09:59 AM by taxpayer
Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book: It seems to me that behavioral economists
at 11/27/2012 08:38 PM by Aaron Wolf
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section. How can I contact you? I have
at 11/27/2012 10:17 AM by Thomas Stringer
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused
at 11/23/2012 08:31 AM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents,"
at 11/21/2012 03:16 PM by Beer Innovation
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our
at 10/24/2012 08:40 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? Gael: I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any
at 10/19/2012 01:12 PM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright
at 10/19/2012 11:46 AM by Gael N.
Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business
at 10/13/2012 08:47 AM by Anonymous
Open Book Publisher Thanks for the great book, and for making it free culture. It's worth mentioning that they don't
at 10/12/2012 04:41 PM by Chris Sakkas
What the New York Times Should Have Asked What is the patent number for the
at 10/09/2012 08:44 AM by Anonymous