logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Let us sincerely hope so

Is this the end of gene patenting?

Comments

A better title would have been "Is this the beginning of the end of gene patenting.?" I assume there will be an appeal to the CAFC. If the CAFC rules against the patent holder, then there will likely be a shot with the Supreme Court. Because this issue is fairly high profile I suspect this case might be fast-tracked. The appeal has to come fairly soon, so watch for the announcement.

Even if this is the beginning of the end for gene patents, the methodologies used to find genes will still remain patentable.

In defense of Myriad Genetics, they spent lots of $$ to discover these genes and their use in cancer therapy, so if you are going to have a patent system to reward incurring sunk costs, then you should give them the patents. That being said, if you dont feel that patents are socially desirable then get rid of the entire system, not just parts of it.
@Paul, so they sunk a lot of money into research, well too bad. We have, at least in theory, a capitalistic system. Risk money and maybe you will be rewarded. People and corporations invest in a lot of things, some make money and some lose money. That's the breaks.

Patents are meant to give a LIMITED monopoly over an invention, not for discovering things. We unfortunately seem to live in a society of ever expansive "rights", patents and copyright being perceived, now, as a right rather than a privilege.

Steve:

Based on my understanding of the Myriad patent, they did in fact discover the genes. They did not invent them. Understanding that those genes are associated with breast cancer is the equivalent of understanding that viruses cause influenza. Congratulations to Myriad for learning that. But, they do not deserve a patent under the present system.

Paul:

Steve is not talking about getting rid of parts of the patent system. He is talking about the fact that the present system does not reward "discovery." "Discover" is, by law, excluded from patentability. Thus, calculus, geometry, physics, quantum mechanics, etc., are all non-patentable because they are not inventions, but creations that explain the world around us. They are excluded, by law, from being patentable.

We'll see later, where it will lead us, we can do that with custom term papers help
Your comments do not make any sense, Sandie.
i'm sure that Term Papers can open smth new for Myriad Genetics!
i'm sure that Term Papers can open smth new for Myriad Genetics!

Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
TwoZeroCincoUno:


Post



   
Find online and local Economics Lessons
Economics Lessons | Add your site

Most Recent Comments

Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the

From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think

The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of

Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even

The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith: Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents,

The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated

Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer: "The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication,

Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books. On-line

Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book: It seems to me that behavioral economists

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section. How can I contact you? I have

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents,"

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our

Would books be published without copyright? Gael: I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any

Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright

Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business

Open Book Publisher Thanks for the great book, and for making it free culture. It's worth mentioning that they don't

What the New York Times Should Have Asked What is the patent number for the