defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
The French government intends to slap a tax of 12 euros on any tablet unless it runs with Windows. One might wonder why France wants to pander Microsoft, but the logic is apparently that anything that is not Windows must be pirated, and that includes Android, Linux and even MacOS. The most bizarre is that a French company, Archos, would be hurt to the benefit of an American company.
Didn't all of Frances Government and Law enforcement just got with Linux as their main OS?
[Comment at 12/30/2010 01:00 PM by Beck]
From what I have read elsewhere the story is exaggerated. The levy applies to tablets with a non-desktop OS, so a tablet with a desktop Linux distro would not need to pay either.
The translation does not make it clear whether the tax apples to Windows CE (or whatever its called these days) or to tablets that come with no OS pre-installed (rare), or a Linux distro with a tablet UI but otherwise a desktop distro.
[Comment at 12/30/2010 10:33 PM by Graeme]
this piece of news seems so strange because, as far as I know, French was forcing is PA to use Linux instead of Microsoft OS. Could be that there is a misunderstanding?
[Comment at 12/31/2010 02:37 AM by Corrado Ruggeri]
That's a misunderstanding. It is about copyright and copyright collection societies and has (normally) nothing to with the OS used.
[Comment at 12/31/2010 08:24 AM by Eckhard Höffner]
The French leadership is a big supporter of copyright, I believe.
In addition, Microsoft gains from users moving up to Windows 7, so they could have struck any of numerous deals with the government that might lead the government to prefer its citizens to use Windows 7. There are many possibilities. The point being that what is best for those making the deals in not necessarily in the best interest of (smaller) French firms or the French population.
It would be interesting to see how Google and others respond.
PS: Wikileaks is open to anonymous French whistle-blowers... though if you use Windows 7, perhaps you won't be that anonymous (we'd need to ask Microsoft).
[Comment at 01/03/2011 03:54 PM by Jose_X]
Hello, antitrust? I thought the EU had strict rules about that sort of collusion, particularly between business and member states' governments.
[Comment at 01/03/2011 08:48 PM by Nobody Nowhere]
Most Recent Comments
at 02/05/2019 07:44 AM by Anonymous
Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good
at 06/19/2018 10:36 PM by Michael Jones
Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback
at 01/09/2018 03:46 AM by Anonymous
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry
at 05/08/2015 08:35 AM by Dan Dobkin
Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace
at 04/10/2015 10:44 AM by Stephan Kinsella
The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default
at 04/10/2015 10:34 AM by Stephan Kinsella
Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without
at 01/08/2015 08:58 PM by Sheogorath
Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do
at 11/17/2014 04:48 AM by David K. Levine
Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous
at 10/29/2014 10:49 AM by Alexander Baker
Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.
at 09/20/2014 03:19 PM by Alexander Baker
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:
at 06/28/2014 10:03 AM by Doris
WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,
at 06/28/2014 10:00 AM by Doris
What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic
at 05/05/2014 01:03 PM by Sheogorath
Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the
at 04/07/2014 04:47 AM by Dan McCracken
Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples
at 01/13/2014 06:13 AM by Anonymous
Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be
at 11/28/2013 05:03 PM by Stephanie Smith
at 11/28/2013 09:23 AM by Anonymous
at 11/28/2013 09:22 AM by Anonymous
Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you
at 11/24/2013 10:48 AM by SpaceCorp Technologies
at 11/20/2013 03:18 PM by Anonymous