logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Microsoft's open-source patent claims

Todd Bishop assesses Microsoft's monopoly gambit here.

Comments


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
CincoUnoNineThree:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555