![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovate |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backViacom seeking a compromise with YouTube? Joe Nocera discusses the suit by Viacom against YouTube and its owner, Google, for copyright infringement link here. It is a pretty good run down, but main-stream-media's requirement for balance forces it to avoid a clear conclusion that YouTube has complied with the take-down requests from Viacom as provided in the DMCA-–and instead seems to leave the case up to the discretion of the judge. That allows Nocera to conclude that there will be a compromise. But it seems to me that the only way that Viacom can win is to get the DCMA changed and that may be their real objective. [Posted at 03/17/2007 08:57 AM by John Bennett on IP in the News Comments I am not sure that Viacom has to change the DMCA. For YouTube to be protected, it must satisfy certain requirements to gain "safe harbor" under the DMCA. Posted here are the requriements http://moonsview.blogspot.com/2007/03/viacom-vs-youtube.html
I am not sure that YouTube qualifies for safe harbor. [Comment at 03/17/2007 04:37 PM by RandomThoughts] Submit Comment |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Most Recent Comments A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como at 06/29/2022 08:48 AM by Abogado de Accidente de Carro en Huntington Park
at 11/27/2021 05:53 PM by Nobody
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
|