A week earlier, Broadcom won a federal district court jury trial that Qualcomm violated three other of its patents. No word on an appeal, but the stakes make it seem certain.
Against Monopoly
defending the right to innovate
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Qualcomm vs Broadcom and the consumer loses
The International Trade Commission ruled yesterday, four to two, that next generation Qualcomm mobile phones slated for the big wireless networks contained semiconductors that violated competing chip maker Broadcom's patent link here. Qualcomm has appealed the decision to a federal court and is calling for a quick reversal on the grounds that the mobile operators and consumers will be "irreparably harmed" and are also appealing to the president through USTR. Charges are flying back and forth, but informed industry sources seem to think something will be worked out, no doubt to the cost of the consumer.
[Posted at 06/08/2007 09:37 AM by John Bennett on IP in the News 
comments(1)]
Comments
Korean cell phone makers using the Qualcomm chip sets have reacted to the ban on imports with emotions ranging from panic to downplaying its significance link here and link here. They are big exporters to the US.
[Comment at 06/09/2007 07:21 AM by John Bennett]
Submit Comment
Most Recent Comments
A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como
at 06/29/2022 08:48 AM by Abogado de Accidente de Carro en Huntington Park
at 11/27/2021 05:53 PM by Nobody
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous