logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

FreeTalkLive on Tucker, IP, and Boldrin & Levine

On tonight's FreeTalkLive (from about 1:06:55 to 1:38:22, again from 1:51:52 and following) the hosts discuss and read Jeff Tucker's entire article Does Innovation Require Property in Ideas? on the air (Tucker's article discusses Boldrin & Levine's Against Intellectual Monopoly). A very lively discussion ensues including--surprise!--a patent lawyer who calls in to meekly support patent law (and also some kind of limits on how much money doctors can spend on marketing... hunh?). (HT to Manuel Lora.)

(Cross-posted on Mises Blog.)


Comments


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoThreeSevenSix:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555