Will they go to court? That would be an interesting chance to reexamine the meaning of fair use. Stay tuned.
![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovate |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
|
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backFox goes after Romney for "unfair use" of video clip We wrote earlier about Fox TV issuing takedown notices to several Republican candidates who used clips from the last debate in their ads. The story gets more interesting now, since Fox has gone after Mitt Romney who had his lawyer reply that what he had done was fair use link here and here. Fox now counterclaims Romney's ad far exceeds fair use.
Will they go to court? That would be an interesting chance to reexamine the meaning of fair use. Stay tuned. [Posted at 11/03/2007 06:40 PM by John Bennett on IP in the News Comments I posted earlier about Mitt Romney refusing to take down a video using some Fox footage of a GOP debate, arguing it was fair use. Fox said it wasn't but no one went to court. Mike Masnick picked the story up but argued link here, "Considering how little attention gets paid to copyright issues during presidential election cycles, this may be about as close as it gets." Nothing new on this front, but the post did elicit some interesting comments in which the concept of fair use got some going over, even if it wasn't always well informed. But getting it discussed is likely to get us ahead in the long run. [Comment at 11/09/2007 07:08 PM by John Bennett] Submit Comment |
|
Most Recent Comments IP is not a joke Bill:
Absolutely. Parody and satire are protected under fair use. Mad Magazine (among many at 02/09/2010 05:41 AM by Anonymous
IP is not a joke Couldn't it be used under the fair use at 02/08/2010 03:22 PM by Bill Stepp
Goldman does in AIG, you, and me Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we are currently at 02/08/2010 03:07 PM by jmb27
Common Sense Seth - I'm not sure how your comment @ 5:57pm casts any illumination on your earlier position. If I at 02/08/2010 02:03 PM by Justin Levine
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Anon, state granted monopolies are effectively licenses for corporations to collect taxes on at 02/08/2010 01:50 PM by Crosbie Fitch
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed It does seem strange to me that when we are faced with the possibility of a 23 trillion dollar at 02/08/2010 01:18 PM by Anonymous
The Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files Fred, I recognise that 'natural monopoly' may have a more specialised meaning for economists, and at 02/08/2010 07:19 AM by Crosbie Fitch
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Fred, I'm doing something immediately. I'm working on the Contingency Market. this is something at 02/08/2010 06:53 AM by Crosbie Fitch
The Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files @Crosbie: I agree *natural monopolies* do exist, despite any tendency for SK and Bill Stepp to shut at 02/07/2010 10:21 PM by Fred McTaker
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed I thank John Bennett for this post, and for the quality of his posts here in general. I've been at 02/07/2010 09:02 PM by Fred McTaker
|