logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Sad Patent Attorney Comments

Patent attorney and pro-patent shill Dale Halling writes: "According to US Patent and Trademark (USPTO) Power Point presentation the allowance rate has again fallen to 41% by mid year 2009. This continues the sad trend of falling allowance rates that started in 2002."

Why is it a "sad trend"? What if there are "too many" "poor quality" patents being issued, and fewer junk patents are being allowed?


Comments

I have no idea what may have happened in the past with you and Mr. Halling, but this post referring to him as a "pro-patent shill" is in my view unprofessional. Yes, this may be a blog, but I see no good reason to depart from proper decorum among professionals.
I have no idea what may have happened in the past with you and Mr. Halling, but this post referring to him as a "pro-patent shill" is in my view unprofessional. Yes, this may be a blog, but I see no good reason to depart from proper decorum among professionals.

Would it be better to call him a pro-monopoly rent-seeking parasite? For that's what he is, professionalism aside.

Mr. Stepp,

I know nothing about your CV, but I do know that Messrs. Kinsella and Halling are both practitioners of law. Professional decorum is more likely to engender a thoughtful response and discussion than "name calling".

I'm not a lawyer, if it matters. DB recently complained in a comment on this blog about a NY Times article that he claimed referred to patents as monopolies. Funny thing is that the article made no such claim, nor did it even mention the word monopoly, as I pointed out in reply. So I wonder just how thoughtful his responses might be.

Professionalism to me implies a certain minimum level of competence. I don't see it in stuff he has written.


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
CincoTwoSevenZero:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

How to extract money for using copyrighted performances The New York Times Magazine followed up on its earlier piece about The Copyright Enforcers with

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost Enabling people to set up contests or awards of prizes is what I hope my Contingency Market can

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost A couple of things can be done to encourage phamaceutical development without creating a monopoly.

Comment Posting Announcement Justin Levine's post has comments disabled again: Paul Allen Files Patent Lawsuits Against The

Germany Not many comments on that article. I presume that means it has a tiny audience. Oh well, I guess

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost To start with, shift the cost burden of later-stage clinical trials to the FDA and

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost If I may ask a very simple question. What would you do to encourage the "invention" of new and

Free textbooks If you are unable to get free textbooks but need cheap college books, I recommend visiting

Comment Posting Announcement Lewis Hyde's Justin Levine has disabled

Music without copyright Thanks for the healthy info. rent