logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Posthumous "Rights of publicity" revisited

Marilyn Monroe is dead but her image lives on as intellectual property and a source of wealth? link here Perhaps no longer. Photographers and other owners of her images have paid license fees to her estate under California law. Now, however, she has been declared a citizen of New York by the Los Angeles Federal District Court because the estate had argued to the California tax man that she was a New York resident. In California, the "rights of publicity" continue after death, but not in New York. The estate will appeal but grounds have yet to be stated.

Good decision in another trivial case. Who will end this plague?


Comments

The dead have no need of privacy (constraint against unauthorised publicity), but then we still need to be careful not to incentivise someone's death as a means to circumvent their privacy.
If the dead have no need for privacy, what does it mean "to circumvent their privacy"?
I was talking about incentivising "someone's death". Clearly that 'someone' is still alive and has a natural right to privacy, and more importantly a natural right to life. Contriving their death could be considered a means of circumventing that privacy right - if corpses have no right to privacy. So, for that reason, I would support a grace period - especially for unnatural deaths. Perhaps 20-50 years?

So, for Marilyn Monroe, whose death was quite unnatural, I think even a 50 year grace period would soon be coming to an end (2012).


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
TwoZeroTwoEight:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

How to extract money for using copyrighted performances The New York Times Magazine followed up on its earlier piece about The Copyright Enforcers with

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost Enabling people to set up contests or awards of prizes is what I hope my Contingency Market can

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost A couple of things can be done to encourage phamaceutical development without creating a monopoly.

Comment Posting Announcement Justin Levine's post has comments disabled again: Paul Allen Files Patent Lawsuits Against The

Germany Not many comments on that article. I presume that means it has a tiny audience. Oh well, I guess

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost To start with, shift the cost burden of later-stage clinical trials to the FDA and

NYTimes finds more IP news but doesn't report its consumer cost If I may ask a very simple question. What would you do to encourage the "invention" of new and

Free textbooks If you are unable to get free textbooks but need cheap college books, I recommend visiting

Comment Posting Announcement Lewis Hyde's Justin Levine has disabled

Music without copyright Thanks for the healthy info. rent