Good decision in another trivial case. Who will end this plague?
![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovate |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
|
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backPosthumous "Rights of publicity" revisited Marilyn Monroe is dead but her image lives on as intellectual property and a source of wealth? link here Perhaps no longer. Photographers and other owners of her images have paid license fees to her estate under California law. Now, however, she has been declared a citizen of New York by the Los Angeles Federal District Court because the estate had argued to the California tax man that she was a New York resident. In California, the "rights of publicity" continue after death, but not in New York. The estate will appeal but grounds have yet to be stated.
Good decision in another trivial case. Who will end this plague? [Posted at 04/07/2008 07:04 AM by John Bennett on IP as a Joke Comments The dead have no need of privacy (constraint against unauthorised publicity), but then we still need to be careful not to incentivise someone's death as a means to circumvent their privacy. [Comment at 04/07/2008 08:44 AM by Crosbie Fitch] If the dead have no need for privacy, what does it mean "to circumvent their privacy"? [Comment at 04/07/2008 05:17 PM by Bill Stepp] I was talking about incentivising "someone's death". Clearly that 'someone' is still alive and has a natural right to privacy, and more importantly a natural right to life. Contriving their death could be considered a means of circumventing that privacy right - if corpses have no right to privacy. So, for that reason, I would support a grace period - especially for unnatural deaths. Perhaps 20-50 years?
So, for Marilyn Monroe, whose death was quite unnatural, I think even a 50 year grace period would soon be coming to an end (2012). [Comment at 04/08/2008 01:52 AM by Crosbie Fitch] Submit Comment |
|
Most Recent Comments IP is not a joke Bill:
Absolutely. Parody and satire are protected under fair use. Mad Magazine (among many at 02/09/2010 05:41 AM by Anonymous
IP is not a joke Couldn't it be used under the fair use at 02/08/2010 03:22 PM by Bill Stepp
Goldman does in AIG, you, and me Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we are currently at 02/08/2010 03:07 PM by jmb27
Common Sense Seth - I'm not sure how your comment @ 5:57pm casts any illumination on your earlier position. If I at 02/08/2010 02:03 PM by Justin Levine
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Anon, state granted monopolies are effectively licenses for corporations to collect taxes on at 02/08/2010 01:50 PM by Crosbie Fitch
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed It does seem strange to me that when we are faced with the possibility of a 23 trillion dollar at 02/08/2010 01:18 PM by Anonymous
The Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files Fred, I recognise that 'natural monopoly' may have a more specialised meaning for economists, and at 02/08/2010 07:19 AM by Crosbie Fitch
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Fred, I'm doing something immediately. I'm working on the Contingency Market. this is something at 02/08/2010 06:53 AM by Crosbie Fitch
The Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files @Crosbie: I agree *natural monopolies* do exist, despite any tendency for SK and Bill Stepp to shut at 02/07/2010 10:21 PM by Fred McTaker
Lessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed I thank John Bennett for this post, and for the quality of his posts here in general. I've been at 02/07/2010 09:02 PM by Fred McTaker
|