Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of
course we
are hungry
for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We
encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded,
you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
back Via the Legal Theory Blog, Suffolk University law professor Stephen M. McJohn has released an interesting paper entitled Patents: Hiding From History.
A summary:
This essay considers how patent law doctrine clouds the historical record of technological development. The essay first surveys a recent book that relied heavily on patent records to reexamine acutely the role of intellectual property in economic development, "The Democratization of Invention," by B. Zorina Khan. The essay's second part discusses how patent law today likely distorts patents as primary historical sources. The law encourages an inventor not to accurately disclose her invention and its place in technological development, but rather to submit vague and overbroad invention descriptions and claims. In describing the invention, some case results perversely favor what one commentator has called "intentional obscurity." Other aspects of law governing disclosure encourage inventors not to define their terms; or identify the category of invention in the preamble; or limit the claims to the actual invention. Likewise, inventors can be at a disadvantage if they explain the advantages of the claimed invention or submit software code used to implement the invention. Even keeping up on technology in the field may hurt the patent applicant. Reform of such rules could help the patent system today, and, as a byproduct, tomorrow's history.
Download the entire essay here.
[Posted at 03/20/2007 05:23 PM by Justin Levine on IP History  comments(0)]
Comments
Submit Comment
Blog Post
|
|
Most Recent Comments IP is not a joke Couldn't it be used under the fair use at 02/08/2010 03:22 PM by Bill SteppGoldman does in AIG, you, and me Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we are currently at 02/08/2010 03:07 PM by jmb27Common Sense Seth - I'm not sure how your comment @ 5:57pm casts any illumination on your earlier position. If I at 02/08/2010 02:03 PM by Justin LevineLessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Anon, state granted monopolies are effectively licenses for corporations to collect taxes on at 02/08/2010 01:50 PM by Crosbie FitchLessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed It does seem strange to me that when we are faced with the possibility of a 23 trillion dollar at 02/08/2010 01:18 PM by AnonymousThe Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files Fred, I recognise that 'natural monopoly' may have a more specialised meaning for economists, and at 02/08/2010 07:19 AM by Crosbie FitchLessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed Fred, I'm doing something immediately. I'm working on the Contingency Market. this is something at 02/08/2010 06:53 AM by Crosbie FitchThe Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Secret Horror Files @Crosbie: I agree *natural monopolies* do exist, despite any tendency for SK and Bill Stepp to shut at 02/07/2010 10:21 PM by Fred McTakerLessig: Congress is broken and Obama has failed I thank John Bennett for this post, and for the quality of his posts here in general. I've been at 02/07/2010 09:02 PM by Fred McTakerIP is not a joke Well, thank *god* that people are looking out for the interests of the "We Are The World" at 02/07/2010 07:10 PM by Scott Carpenter |
