logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Free digital texts try to break the oligopoly on classroom textbooks

Details from the L.A. Times:

Caltech economics professor R. Preston McAfee finds it annoying that students and faculty haven't looked harder for alternatives to the exorbitant prices. McAfee wrote a well-regarded open-source economics textbook and gave it away -- online. But although the text, released in 2007, has been adopted at several prestigious colleges, including Harvard and Claremont-McKenna, it has yet to make a dent in the wider textbook market.

"I was disappointed in the uptake," McAfee said recently at an outdoor campus cafe. "But I couldn't continue assigning idiotic books that are starting to break $200."

McAfee is one of a band of would-be reformers who are trying to beat the high cost -- and, they say, the dumbing down -- of college textbooks by writing or promoting open-source, no-cost digital texts. ... "What makes us rich as a society is what we know and what we can do," he said. "Anything that stands in the way of the dissemination of knowledge is a real problem."

McAfee said he wrote his open-source book because the traditional textbook market is broken. Textbook and college supply prices nearly tripled between 1986 and 2004, an audit by the federal Government Accountability Office found in 2005.

Read the whole thing here.

Then, if you want to learn something about economics, download Professor McAfee's textbook here.

Also check out the Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching [MERLOT] here.


Comments

It ain't open source because the book is licensed under Creative Common Noncommercial Sharealike license.

At least it is one step in the right direction.

I don't know much about McAfee's book, but from a quick glance it is not apparent that it follows the Austrian economics school; therefore, I imagine there are better books one can learn economics from, such as the following, all free and online: David Gordon, An Introduction to Economic Reasoning; Essentials of Economics, Faustino Ballvé; Henry Hazlitt, Economics in One Lesson; Gene Callahan, Economics for Real People; Jim Cox, The Concise Guide to Economics.
Kiba - Fair point in distinguishing between 'open-source' and Creative Commons. The L.A. Times misused the term.

Stephan - McAfee's book admittedly isn't an intro to Economics per se, but rather an intro to economic 'analysis' - a topic that can be distinguished from basic economic principles. I'm not hugely familiar with other texts on the subject, so can't say if there are others out there that are better.

Justin, thanks for the clarification. Is McAfee's consistent with Austrian economics?

Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoUnoNineQuatro:


Post



   
Find online and local Economics Lessons
Economics Lessons | Add your site

Most Recent Comments

3D Printing Groundnut: The first available 3D printers were produced in the early 1980s. Because those

3D Printing You were aware, I hope, that the popularization of 3D printing is happening now, rather than 20

Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the

From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think

The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of

Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even

The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith: Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents,

The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated

Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer: "The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication,

Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books. On-line

Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book: It seems to me that behavioral economists

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section. How can I contact you? I have

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents,"

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our

Would books be published without copyright? Gael: I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any

Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright

Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business